The idea that smaller earthquakes (aftershocks) follow major
earthquakes is a well-established concept in geophysics. However,
aftershocks are not explained by the avalanche model that is used to
describe earthquakes and similar phenomena such as the cracking of solid
materials. The model dictates that events such as earthquakes are
random and therefore there should be no correlation between successive
earthquakes. Now, Sanja Janićević, Lasse Laurson
and colleagues at Aalto University in Finland have shown that this
discrepancy could simply be a result of how aftershocks are measured.
Writing in Physical Review Letters,
the physicists describe experiments in which they monitored the
cracking of a solid material. They found that when they set the
detection threshold of their apparatus at high values – to avoid
measuring noise – an individual avalanche event appeared as a sequence
of seemingly unrelated events. However, when they reduced the detection
threshold, what had previously appeared to be aftershocks were actually
part of the main avalanche event.
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/dec/02/flash-physics-earthquake-puzzle-solved-scientists-write-to-trump-nuclear-pasta-delays-neutrinos
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2016/dec/02/flash-physics-earthquake-puzzle-solved-scientists-write-to-trump-nuclear-pasta-delays-neutrinos
No comments :
Post a Comment